蘑菇AV

Over 200 million people apparently have used Snap's personalized AI chatbot, My AI, correct? Jasmine Enberg:. Mm-hmm. Marcus Johnson:. To collectively send over 20 billion messages since Snap debuted in April. Jasmine, let's end the lead by talking about some of their branded content tools that they just put out. Any takes on those? Jasmine Enberg:. Yeah, absolutely.

Microsoft scrapped Cortana in favor of reinventing Bing Chat, Apple is reportedly testing an 鈥淎pple GPT,鈥� Google has launched numerous genAI initiatives, and a host of startups are racing to make chatbots more capable. Amazon needs to move quickly to maintain Alexa as a voice assistant leader.

I mean, yeah, you can argue that financial literacy is going to happen organically for young folks, especially for younger people through the internet, social media, maybe even the AI powered chatbot you're talking about. So we should just step them back and let them find their own information. And I think Sumit would agree as a parent that sounds not just really scary, but a bit outlandish.

Now, I should caveat all this the same way any responsible person would caveat anything related to ai, which is that you don't want to use any chat bot, any AI chat bot in existence if getting the answer to the question is extremely important that it has to be absolutely accurate, any better at being good at that than anything else.

He just quit his job at Google and he said AI chatbots were scary, and he also said, "Right now, they're not more intelligent than us," as far as he can tell, but he thinks they soon may be. So some very prominent voices in this space starting to ring the alarm. Suzy Davidkhanian:. I do think that anxiety is good, right?

He notes that Covariance, a robotic software startup is designing technology that lets robots learn skills much like chatbots do. Mr. Metz explains that Covariance goal is to help robots understand what is going on around them and decide what they should do next as humans talk to them the way they do ChatGPT. What could possibly go wrong?

So you can envision, this would probably be a bit further out, but someone being able to interact with ChatGPT, for example, a chatbot with their mind, instead of having to access it directly on a device, and this is in line with Musk's plan for an augmented human intelligence. Musk did say that this technology could help offset the AI related job losses that people concerned about.

And then the second thing here was Aqara's home copilot chatbot that you can ask to do things like set up an automation that turns your lights off at 10 PM, locks the doors, and lowers the shades all at the same time. But to your point, and as Ms.

Today's real topic, AI, regulation rumblings, Grammy rules and chatbots eating themselves. In today's episode, we'll cover how artificial intelligence might be governed and what happens when AI eats itself. Then for in other news, we'll discuss the impact of Apple's Vision Pro MR Headset. We start, of course with the lead, talking AI. Let's kick off with some regulations.

So back in April, a mayor in Australia called Brian Hood said he may take legal action over false information shared by advanced chat bot ChatGPT, notes Tom Gerken of the BBC. This comes after the Open AI own tool, falsely claimed he was imprisoned for bribery while working for a subsidiary of Australia's national bank. His lawyers have sent a concerns notice to Open AI.

Someone was telling me in that same side conversation that they've heard of some customer service centers going from hundreds and hundreds of people to using a generative AI chatbot and they've cut staff incredibly in terms of cost savings, which is obviously not great. Hopefully those people will get reskilled and moved into different jobs.

And we've got another episode on chat bots, what they can do for businesses and what CMOs should be thinking about when it comes to generative AI. That episode comes out March 13th. But that's all we've got time for this episode. Bill, thank you so much for hanging out with us on the Daily. Bill Fisher:. Awesome. It's great to be here. Marcus Johnson:. Yes, sir.

It's so important to getting the best output, and I think the best way to think about chatbots like ChatGPT is as assistants or brainstorming partners. They're not professionals that can do your job for you. And I think we are seeing a lot of inappropriate use cases that do make them seem useless, like the lawyer that just used ChatGPT in a court filing and ChatGPT ended up citing six fake cases.

I mean, we're seeing the social platforms already start to incorporate generative AI chatbots like Snapchat has. Meta is leaning more into the content creation side of things. And there's got to be somebody out there. They're building a generative AI platform.

You can see that even in [00:19:00] the space where Google is going to probably have a chatbot interface to compete with ChatGPT, and Meta is looking to do similar things in that regard. You've obviously seen more and more emphasis from Amazon as an ad player to go against some of the stalwarts that we always talk about within the digital advertising space.